Return of the King: A Review

Well, last night I had the chance to see an advanced screening of Return of the King. Interested in my review? Read below. (Note-- there will be spoilers, so if you want your experience pure and unspoilt, don't read.)First off, here's a disclaimer-- I haven't read the books. I thought the first film was a little too "Xena-like", in that I wasn't always sure what was going on, what the rules were for the world, etc. and didn't quite get into the weightiness of the drama. I liked the second film a lot more and like everyone else was impressed with the special effects, particularly Gollum.

But the third film-- this Return of the King-- was just a breath-taking experience that in some ways reminded me of when I saw Star Wars as a little kid. This is the film that delivered what the new Star Wars movies promised. ROTK is not a flawless movie, and I'm not saying it's Star Wars per se, but then I'm not six years old any more. If I were, this film and The original Matrix would be my Star Wars films. I can say this: the LOTR series is without a doubt the best fantasy genre film series ever. Move over, Conan.

There are two stars in this movie. The first is the special effects, which appear in nearly every shot and put ILM and PDI's recent work to shame. They are so natural, and the transitions from CG to live action so seamless, that you have to keep reminding yourself that this place doesn't really exist because your brain is telling you, "But it's there! I saw it!" From the giant spider to the battle sequences (which reminded me very much of the AT-AT walker Hoth invasion from Empire Strikes back amped up about 1000%) to the Gollem's new Schitzophrenic plotting (this time talking to his reflection in a pool of water), the New Zealand effects team has crossed a line in special effects. They are the team to beat. The gold standard. They are the ILM of this generation.

The second star of this film is Sean Astin. At first I couldn't figure out why the American kid from Goonies would be cast in a fantasy epic like this. But Astin tears up the film, and should be nominated for, if not win, a Best Supporting Oscar for his performance here. Though most of the movie consists of he and Frodo making thier way through Mordor (?) to throw the Ring into a volcano, his character Sam's unflagging devotion to his friend and his determination to succeed is so pure and utterly heartbreaking at times that even I found myself choked up. Astin is the real standout star of this third film, no question in my mind. This is his film.

Visually, the film is among the best I have seen, but as I said the movie is not without its flaws. I did get bored at times during this almost 3 1/2 hour experience, particularly in scenes involving Liv Tyler's elf and her father. I just didn't know what the hell they were talking about. I also felt a lot of scenes repeated over and over ("get up Mr. Frodo." "no sam, I can't.. Too tired." "I'll help you Mr. Frodo"..) but I assume that's a reflection of the book, and although it got tough to sit through for three hours, after it's all over it isn't too bad.

Nor did I understand exactly where these giant eagles came from towards the end (maybe it was explained, but I missed it). And there were a lot of other conveniences-- it just so happens that there is an entire undead army around when you need them who happens to owe you a favor. I've noticed that much of the LOTR plotting involves getting armies to battles in time to show up and kick ass.

The biggest note sure to be brought up again and again is the 25-30 minute ending to the film. Or rather, endings. We see the same "goodbye, thank you for your help" scene two or three times, intercut with various "returning to the shire" scenes. One of each would have sufficed. And at one point everyone gets on a boat in the Elf village to sail away. Where and why I'm not sure.

So there are some problems, but these are minor flaws in a film that has so many strengths and awesome moments that they basically fade into the background.

I've been a fan of Peter Jackson's since his early, independent "bad taste" films like "Dead Alive" and "Meet the Feebles". It's really cool to see him ascend to such heights. He's worked tirelessly to get there. So a big congrats to him and the many thousands of people who made this movie happen.

The Fanboys will not be disappointed. I've already seen "Cold Mountain". I've seen "The House of Sand and Fog". I've seen "Mystic River". I've seen "Seabiscuit". This one film rules them all.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Return of the King: A Review

Great review. 90% of the things that mystified you about the film (the Elves sailing away, the Army of the Dead, The Eagles) are all explained in the films in one form or another. I will admit that sometimes Jackson takes one's knowledge of the book and history for granted, but if he tried to explain them more they would distract form the story and it's pacing.

If you watch the first and second films again, I am sure you would know exactly where and why the Elves are leaving Middle Earth.

Again, great review. It's nice to see that someone who did not read the books can still enjoy a master work like this.

Re: Return of the King: A Review (SPOILERS STILL)

Great review. 90% of the things that mystified you about the film (the Elves sailing away, the Army of the Dead, The Eagles) are all explained in the films in one form or another. I will admit that sometimes Jackson takes one's knowledge of the book and history for granted, but if he tried to explain them more they would distract form the story and it's pacing.

Just saw it a 2nd time today. Having read a bit more about the story, and paying much closer attention this time, I realized that some of the info is in fact explained...

1. Before the eagles show up, a moth appears to the white wizard. I had forgotten that this moth was used in an earlier film to summon the eagles. (Someone reminded me of this later...)

2. The Elves sailing away-- it was SORT of explained that they were going to leave Middle Earth, and Gandalf says something about having done his job, but it is not quite clear still why Frodo must go with him. Someone online has told me that it was because he was corrupted by the ring, but I don't get how exactly.

3. The army of the dead still seems convenient however. A big deal is made when Aragorn leaves to go get them-- the humans think he may be running in their hour of need. I don't get why exactly he doesn't just say, "I'm going to get the undead army".

4. I don't get why Liv Tyler's fate is tied to the ring. I still don't quite understand Aragorn's (that's his name, right?) relationship to Liv Tyler, nor who Cate Blanchette is, or what the significance of the white crystalline necklace was about. If anyone wants to fill me in on this, it'd be much appreciated.

If I think of any more revelations, I'll post them here Eye-wink

Re: Return of the King: A Review (SPOILERS STILL)

Very good review of the movie, I'm glad you hadn't read the books, it give you a fresh perspective on the story. I think the films were an incredible effort and I give serious props to the production companies for letting a practically unknown director spend $300 million on a fantasy film. I don't know whether they're crazy or geniuses. Even though I love the story, I'm not certain I would have had the balls to green light it.

To answer some of the questions though:

The Elves are leaving Middle Earth because a new age is beginning, an age without magic. Elves are inherently magical, so they cannot survive without the presence of magic. This to a lesser degree is also true of the Ringbearers. If you look back at the story, anyone in the story who had worn a ring of power (and thereby had been touched by magic) either died or left Middle Earth in some form or another. That is the reason Frodo and Bilbo left. (BTW, Sam was affected by this becuase he never actually put on the One ring)

As for the army of the dead, they are actually a group from another book that Tolkien wrote about the first war of the ring when Isildur was king. They betrayed him and were cursed until they fufilled their promise. Their function in the storyline was that they provided a transition point in Aragorn's character from the Ranger mentality to the mentality of a King. By calling out that debt owed, he symbolically and literally was coronated King of Gondor.

Arwen's fate isn't tied directly to the ring but to Aragorn, that necklace he wears is a connection to him, by giving it to him she made a decision to grow old and die in Middle Earth instead of travelling to the Grey Havens with the rest of the Elves. The two fell in love with each other even though (in elf terms) their life together would be interminably short. That is why, in an earlier film, when Arwen gives Aragorn the necklace he refuses it at first, because he knows that it will end in her death.

Cate Blanchette was Galadriel, Queen of the elven kingdom of Lothlorien. She didn't have very much to do as far as the storyline was concerned. Her primary contributions were the gifts that she give the fellowship (the camoflague cloaks, star of elendil, etc.) and she is the first person Frodo (and the audience) actually witnesses being tested by the ring. Other than that, she's a bit player.

THANK YOU!

Thanks for the clear explanations! So, if I am to understand correctly, when the wizard says "thus begins the age of man", basically all magic is eliminated from Middle Earth for some reason, and at some later point Middle Earth becomes Modern Earth? (in which case, all those mountains and stuff should have a modern equavalent, platonic shifts notwithstanding...)

When I was a kid, I'd always assumed "Middle Earth" meant somehow this was underground, under the earth in a "middle" layer, but I'm just realizing this may be Middle Earth the way we say "Old English" and "Middle English" -- ie, this is pre-history of some kind. I'd read that Tolkien had wanted this to be some kind of myth of England-- so do the Middle Earth locations have geographic equivalents in England? (I'm sure all the architecture had long been uh, crushed to dust, since there is no geological record of these places... hehehe)

I wish some of this explanation was in the movie-- but it is nice to be able to talk to people who've read the book(s) and they explain a lot of what I missed. The movie is certainly enjoyable as-is, but I bet it's truly awesome if you have a more thorough understanding of the stuff that isn't really explained in the films.

I wonder-- what ever happened to the Hobbits and their civilization? If the humans basically evolved to become modern humans, what of the Shire? Did they die out at some point?

Again, thanks for the excellent clarifications.

Re: Return of the King: A Review

I am sorry, but you need to read the book. Liv Tyler's-madeup character in this book does not kiss the king. I would be rude since he marries the princess of Rohan.

Apparently, Jackson did not think the princess was pretty enough to kiss the king.

Re: Return of the King: A Review

Return of the King. More like Return to Crying. 1 hour of the movies was devoted to characters crying at the end. With leaving out important plot developing scenes, you would think Jackson could of left out some crying and put in some of Token's ideas.

Jackson demonstrated that he cared about keeping the story intact in the first two movies, but for some odd reason he threw his ethics in the third movie. I can't believe that winnig an award was worth giving Liv Tyler's salary (for those of you who haven't read the book- she's only in it for 2-3 pages)

Re: THANK YOU!

I have to also give due credit to the author of the first review as i am pleased to find a non-reader of LOTR able to watch and understand and give a clear headed view of what Middle Earth is like for them!!

****So, if I am to understand correctly, when the wizard says "thus begins the age of man", basically all magic is eliminated from Middle Earth for some reason, and at some later point Middle Earth becomes Modern Earth? ****

ANSWER: Almost! The time frame Tolkein was going far was when the earth had no recorded history - he basically wanted to make up a mythology for britain because unlike many other countries who had their own mythology, Britain did not. Not all magic is eliminated, it just fades as the world of men grows and they forget this "past."

*****so do the Middle Earth locations have geographic equivalents in England?*****

ANSWER: Hrmm, this is a hotly contested topic, though not exactly right. It is true he modelled The Shire on the town he used to live in as a boy, but not all places have an equaivalent as he allows for the wrold to change signifigantly.

*****what ever happened to the Hobbits and their civilization? If the humans basically evolved to become modern humans, what of the Shire? Did they die out at some point?*****

ANSWER: I think, and i could be wrong, this was explained either in the foreword of the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings. He says they are a species few in number but able to, at the first sign of human activity, disappear. The notes say how men began to forget the hobbits and now we see them no more. I don't know how accurate this is as i don't have the books at hand, you will have to read them youself i guess! *grin*

One last note on Galadriel and the rings. All the rings of power (and there were 9 for men[all corrupted and destroyed], 7 for dwarves, 3 for elves and the ruling ring) were tied together. Once the ONE ring was destroyed their power would cease as well, so in fact, Galadriel - a wielder of Nenya the Adamant an elven ring of great power - knows this when Frodo comes to her, knows that if he succeeds the time of the elves will end and the beauty of Lothlorien will fade as the power that sustains it is gone. If she had taken the ring, she would have saved the elves but in turn become corrupted.
By declining the offer of the one ring by Frodo she is able to be accpeted back to Valinor (a place of peace and healing where the elves go to leave Middle Earth if they haven't already died - thats what you see them sailing off to) as she once had done a great wrong and this righted it a long time ago, (or something to that effect) and showed her strength and compassion.
It's actually one of the greatest displays of sacrifice. The world has found their new King - Aragorn -, the evil is destroyed forever and she can see that there is no room now for the elves in this "New Age".

Now Arwen, Liv Tyler, had a choice she could either go to Valinor with her people and Father or stay and die as a mortal. Choose to be elf or mortal. As a mortal she would feel the weight of mortality including old age, pain, greif and death. As an elf she would loose Aragorn, and when she goes to the undying lands (Valinor) her love will never be more than a memory. Either father or Aragorn....... one of the hardest decisions to make as she will never see her father again if she chooses mortality and Aragorn - not even in death as her father is immortal.
Her fate is tied to the ring as when it is destroyed then she will have to choose. Will she choose to stay with the leader of men Aragorn and die or go with the elves whose time has ended now that the power of the Elven Rings has gone and a new leader of men is chosen - no longer leaderless.

I hope this brings you more clarification, it is the best i can do at such a time. If you have any more queries please ask them and I'm sure someone will try and explain them over. I am sorry also if i have confused you... i tend to do that sometimes!!

Whyte Ivy

Re: THANK YOU!

Thanks. That middle message ("THANK YOU") was also from me, though I was not logged in.

Well I think that a lot of this info is helpful in getting a sense of what was happening... Thanks for helping to clarify it. Hopefully other people who hadn't read the book will find this information useful as well!

Thanks again,

W

Re: Return of the King: A Review

Arwen is not made-up. An elf who chooses mortality, she marries Aragorn, the king. The Rohan princess, Eowin, marries Faramir, son of the steward of Gondor. Their story will most likely have more detail in the extended edition of the film.

Re: Return of the King: A Review

Hello! I am called Ane and I like to score the news that there are in Internet. As I have long free time, I spend the whole afternoons sailing through the Web. I write in Spanish although many to you of you equal not me entendais. I feel much. This news seems to me very interesting. On the other hand, I like to know people new and if quereis me podeis to send an email when querais. In this text you will find paginas Web very interesting. Texto honetan aurkituko dituzue web on batzuk� amateurphotosx [www.amateurphotosx.amateursx.info ] amateursex [www.amateursex.amateursx.info] asexeporno [www.sexeporno.amateursx.info] webcamamateur [www.webcamamateur.amateursx.info] amteurlibertin [www.amateurlibertin.amateursx.info] filmsamateur [www.filmsamateur.amateursx.info] nufemme [www.nufemme.amateursx.info] teenamateur [www.teenamateur.amateursx.info] amateurgay [www.amateurgay.amateursx.info] videossexex [www.videossexex.amateursx.info] amateurteen [www.amateurteen.amateursx.info] coupleamateur [www.coupleamateur.amateursx.info] echangisteamateur [www.echangisteamateur.amateursx.info] sexamateur [www.sexamateur.amateursx.info] fellationamateur [www.fellationamateur.amateursx.info] amateursexe [www.amateursexe.amateursx.info] amateurslibertin [www.amateurslibertin.amateursx.info] videosamateur [www.videosamateur.amateursx.info] amateurphotosx [www.amateurphotosx.amateursx.info ]